Apr 11, 2022

Preliminary Analytical Review Procedures in a Financial Statement Audit

6 Key Things You Need to Know!

If you’re responsible for conducting audits of privately-held entities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAS), there are some key considerations pertaining to performing preliminary analytical review procedures during planning.


Keep in mind that AU-C Section 315, Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement, specifies that our risk assessment activities should include analytical procedures.


Well-designed preliminary analytical review procedures are based on appropriate expectations of plausible relationships can be very effective in identifying risks of material misstatement (RMM) during the risk assessment process in audit planning. However, because preliminary analytical review procedures are ideally performed early in the process, the analytical procedures may use information that is aggregated at a relatively high-level (i.e., recent interim financial statements or, if financial statements are not available, a general ledger or trial balance). Information aggregated at a relatively high-level is appropriate at this stage of the audit because the intent of the audit engagement team is to identify potential audit issues or risks, and not reach a conclusion on the reasonableness of a specific balance. Accordingly, audit engagement teams need to consider the results of preliminary analytical review procedures along with other information gathered in identifying the risks of material misstatement.


Here are six factors to be aware of:

 

Prior Knowledge of the Client’s Industry and Business Operations

Knowledge of audit clients’ operations and the industry in which they operate in is strongly linked to the effective use of analytical procedures for audit planning and assessing risk. 


Engagement teams are expected to understand a client's business and industry and to know what relationships could be expected to exist, what relationships would be considered unusual or unlikely, and what plausible explanations might exist for observed relationships, prior to performing preliminary analytics.


Preliminary analytical review procedures might include reviewing changes in account balances from the prior to the current year using the client’s internal financial statements or a grouped trial balance or analysis of ratios or trends related to profitability, liquidity, solvency, and activity.

 

Identification of Potential Risks in an Audit 

Analytical review procedures, among other procedures used in the planning stage only need to be designed to identify audit areas with unusual or unexpected relationships that may be indicative of potential risks and material misstatements, thus needing linkage and consideration of impact on the audit plan by the engagement team. In the audit of companies with simple operations, simple comparisons and ratios are ordinarily effective, whereas in more complex engagements the engagement team may need to make use of complex mathematical or statistical models such as ratio or trend analysis.

 

Consideration of Revenue

In addition to the requirement in AU-C 315 to perform analytical procedures as part of risk assessment procedures, AU-C 240, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit, requires that, to the extent they are not already included, analytical procedures should include procedures related to revenue recognition. Audit engagement teams perform preliminary analytical review procedures related to revenue to identify unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate fraudulent financial reporting. 

 

Use of Interim Financial Information

When audit engagement teams are using interim financial information for their preliminary analytical review, keep in mind certain factors, such as seasonal trends, that might be considered in making comparisons. For example, if the audit engagement team is using information as of the end of November and the client's business is highly seasonal with substantial activity in December; a straight annualization of interim information will not provide a meaningful comparison. Sometimes, particular accounting methods may make comparisons less meaningful such as if the client uses the LIFO inventory method; comparison of gross profit ratios might be improved by restoring LIFO reserves before computing the ratio. Audit engagement teams should also be aware of the possibility of events such as strikes or changes in production methods that influence comparability.

 

Bring Professional Skepticism to the Assessment

Audit engagement teams should avoid making mechanical computations and comparisons when documenting their preliminary analytical review. We encourage audit professionals to bring in as much skepticism, creativity and insight to the assessment as possible.

In the audits of most recurring clients, audit engagement teams likely have a sufficient understanding of the client and its operations to judgmentally consider the expected relationships. The audit engagement team will need to document these expectations based on their knowledge of the client, the industry, the economy and current discussions with management.

 

Included below are some examples of unusual or unexpected relationships and possible risks that may exist for audit engagement teams to consider:

Unusual or Unexpected Relationships Potential Implications to the Audit
Increased sales with decreased inventories Improper revenue recognition, theft of inventory, inventory valuation issues, physical inventory observation errors, etc.
Decreased sales with increased receivables Uncollectible receivables
Decreased compensation expense with increase in sales Payroll accrual recognition issues, improper cost allocation issues, etc.
Increased net income with decreased cash flows Uncollectible receivables, going concern issues, sales or expense cut-off issues, etc.
Increased payables with decreased inventory Going concern issues, payable defalcation schemes, physical inventory observation errors, theft of inventory, etc.
Unusual increases in miscellaneous income Revenue classification issues, improper revenue recognition or customer deposits, etc.
Unusual items in operating expenses Issues in expense classification, improper expensing of capital acquistions, missappropriation of assets, etc.

Documentation Requirements

Documentation of preliminary analytical review procedures must be sufficient to provide linkage to the audit engagement team's risk assessment. The results of the preliminary analytical review ordinarily are documented using a narrative memorandum, comparative carry forward schedule, or other combination thereof. The documentation should address how the engagement team: (a) developed their expectations, (b) compared their expectations to the client’s actual amounts to see if they were met or not, and (c) selected which balance sheet and income statement accounts require audit attention. One common form of documentation is referred to as a “flux analysis.” A flux analysis is a narrative explanation by financial statement caption or line item of the change in the amount from the prior period and of any unusual or unexpected relationships to other financial statement line items in the current period. Although a flux analysis is not required by standards, it’s recommended as a convenient means of documenting the thought process of the audit engagement team.

 

Collemi Consulting has significant expertise with respect to the performance of preliminary analytical review procedures in a financial statement audit. Contact us so we can assist with the process and help ensure that you’ll able to comply withProfessional Standards.

Learn More

Cultivating Connections

22 Apr, 2024
Follow these strategies to hone your face-to-face networking skills.

Training Time

03 Jan, 2024
Many public accounting firms don’t focus enough on training their professional staff on how to properly research. Don’t make this risky mistake!

Hook 'em! How to Deliver More Compelling Presentations

21 Dec, 2023
Prepping to give a presentation? Here’s a quick trick: Make sure your introduction is attention-getting, and you’ll help ensure your audience members are thoroughly engaged until the very end. If you’re giving a slide presentation, that means that your first three slides are critical. A recent survey of businesspeople by Storydoc, a business presentation company, revealed that 80 percent of audience members who are engaged in the first three slides of a presentation will likely stick with you until the end of your presentation. That’s critical, considering another Gallup study that revealed that 60% of businesspeople admit to being “indifferent” to presentations, while another 11% say they’re “actively disengaged.” So, what to include in those first three slides? The best strategy is to start off with a hook: an eye-catching photo, an impressive number, an agonizing problem that members of the audience are likely to face, or a shocking statistic. Adding that hook toward the beginning of your presentation will help reel the audience in. Here are some additional presentation best practices that we at Collemi Consulting recommend: Know your audience. Understanding who comprises your audience is critical so that you can ensure you’re covering the material that matters the most to them. If you’re speaking at a conference or training event, get a list of attendees ahead of time and see who they are and where they’re from so that you can get an idea of their background. If it’s possible to communicate with attendees beforehand, send them a note introducing yourself and ask them if there are specific issues, they’d like you to touch on during your presentation. Ask questions. If you don’t interact with your audience at the beginning of your presentation, people will settle into a passive “TV-watching” mode, and it will be difficult to keep them engaged. And asking questions can also help you zero in on what matters most to the audience. For instance, you might throw out a question like, “What keeps you up at night most, XX or XX?” (reference specific challenges). Or, ask people to raise their hands if they’ve struggled with a specific obstacle. Then, you can be sure to address the challenges that most audience members indicate they’ve faced. Another way to keep people engaged with questions is by throwing out “trivia” questions related to specific new accounting standards or something else that pertains to the content you’re covering. If you make participants feel like they’re part of the presentation, they’ll be much more likely to pay attention — and retain the information. Add visual appeal. While your presentation is likely filled with a lot of important content, it’s critical to remember not to overload your audience with pages and pages of text. Break up slides with text and simple photos or illustrations that support your message. A well-chosen image is a welcome break from text that can grab your audience’s attention and help reinforce your message. You can find professional stock images on sites like Shutterstock. Provide a next step. Don’t just end your presentation abruptly by thanking people for coming. Close by including a slide that mentions what you’d like the audience to do with the information you shared with them. Perhaps you’d like them to make a list of ‘to-dos’ that will help them implement the information you’ve shared with them. Or maybe you’ll invite them to reach out to you should they need your services. A solid closing will build rapport — and help audience members retain what they’ve learned. Collemi Consulting leverages almost three decades of experience in providing trusted technical accounting and auditing expertise when you need it the most. Salvatore A. Collemi, CPA, Managing Member & Founder, is regarded as an industry leader and subject matter expert by various organizations and media outlets. To schedule an appointment to see how we might work together, contact us at (732) 792-6101.

Marketing for Auditors: 4 Savvy Strategies

20 Nov, 2023
Want to know the difference between high-growth and average-growth firms in the public accounting profession? Here’s a hint: It begins with the letter “M.” If you guessed “marketing,” you’re correct. According to the 2023 High Growth Study by Hinge, public accounting and finance firms grew at a median rate of 11%, lagging behind many other professional services categories. But the study also uncovered that public accounting firms that focus on marketing as a top priority see regular, year-over-year growth of 20% or more! Here is the good news: You don’t have to be a Big 4 firm with extensive resources to leverage marketing to your advantage. Small-and mid-sized CPA firms, and even sole practitioners, can take some simple steps to differentiate themselves in their respective field. Many auditors & accountants and their firms are missing out on major opportunities to target clients using tools that are right at their disposal. Here are four strategies to build visibility for your practice and differentiate yourself from your competitors: Strategy #1—Public Speaking. Landing speaking gigs at industry conferences or on an industry podcasts or webinars are one of the best ways to position yourself and your firm as an expert in the field. Speaking gigs offer auditors a platform to showcase their knowledge, provide insights on relevant topics and establish themselves as an authority in the field while increasing their firm’s visibility. You can use speaking engagements to share best practices, identify emerging trends and offer solutions. To get started, do some research on upcoming conferences in your area where you might offer to contribute. Your State Society and local Chambers of Commerce may also have seminars or online events that offer speaking opportunities. Strategy #2—Create a newsletter. Some savvy CPA firms create email newsletters that provide valuable and relevant information to clients and prospects. Sending out periodic newsletters helps drive traffic to your website or blog (when you include links to relevant articles or resources), builds credibility by positioning yourself and your firm as a subject matter expert (SME), and encourages social sharing. If your content is engaging, it may prompt subscribers to share it on social media. Your newsletter doesn’t have to be lengthy: Two to three short articles, plus a call to action at the end, is enough to capture a reader’s attention. Strategy #3—Include lead magnets on your website. Lead magnets are incentives on your website that you offer potential clients in exchange for their contact information. For example, you might offer a white paper you’ve created on an important topic or a PDF that highlights important new information regarding the latest accounting rules. Creating these kinds of lead magnets can help you grow you email list and build a database of potential leads. Strategy #4—Amp up your social media. You may already be leveraging social sites like LinkedIn to promote yourself or your business, but are you gaining followers and increasing engagement? The best way to grow followers and generate more interaction is to share information of real value to those you want to target. It’s also important to post content frequently and interact regularly with followers. Remember that social media is all about dialogue (not sales pitches!). Approach it as a conversation; post content your followers are likely to share or comment upon, which will extend your reach to their connections. Be generous with your time and advice, and potential clients will want to work with you. Short on time? Pick one or two of these strategies to focus intently on in the upcoming year; the investment in time will be worth it. Collemi Consulting leverages nearly three decades of experience to provide trusted technical accounting and auditing expertise when you need it the most. We regularly work with CPA firm leadership to help them reduce risk and maximize efficiencies to grow their attest practices. To schedule an appointment, contact us at (732) 792-6101.
More Posts
Share by: